“有性的”造句

大多数州立法既非专有性的,也不是歧视性的, 所以应归为第三类.
Most state legislation is neither proprietary nor discriminatory, and thus falls into the third class.

不管指称的实体是否有生命,所有名词都有性的差别.
And all nouns have gender distinctions whether they refer to animate entities.

“占有性的创造: 马来西亚的精神和国际合作”, 28-42 页.
The Production of Possession: Spirits and the Multinational Corporation in Malaysia. 28 - 42 .

相关问题